|
(1,2) |
[R] ivtobit postestimation, p. 786–787
|
In Options for predict, the first sentence in the description of
e() should end with "truncated", and the first sentence in the
description of ystar() should end with "censored".
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[R] ml, p. 1059–1083
|
The documentation for [R] ml has been updated to document
new features added in the 11 Feb 2010 Stata 11 update. To see
the latest PDF of [R] ml, click here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[R] nbreg postestimation, p. 1142–1145
|
The documentation for [R] nbreg postestimation has been
updated to document predict's new options
pr(n) and
pr(a,b), which were added in the
03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [R] nbreg postestimation, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[R] poisson postestimation, p. 1375–1380
|
The documentation for [R] poisson postestimation has been
updated to document predict's new options
pr(n) and
pr(a,b), which were added in the
03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [R] poisson postestimation, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[R] suest, p. 1803–1809
In previous versions of the manual, mlogit was used instead
of mprobit in example 1. Although the commands were changed
to mprobit, several references to multinomial
logistic regression instead of multinomial probit regression
remain throughout the example.
Also, the first paragraph on page 1805 states that the second
Hausman test is not well defined. That was the case when the models
were fit with mlogit in previous versions of the
manual. However, the Hausman test is well defined in the output
shown in the current manual.
The first paragraph on page 1807 states that "although the classic
Hausman test computed by hausman is not defined here, the
suest-based test is just fine". This statement assumes that
the Hausman test on page 1805 is not well defined, but as stated
above, the Hausman test is well defined.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[R] suest, p. 1809, last Stata command on page
|
. test [allcars=foreign], common
|
. test [allcars_choice=foreign_choice], common
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[R] zinb postestimation, p. 2046–2047
|
The documentation for [R] zinb postestimation has been
updated to document predict's new options
pr(n) and
pr(a,b), which were added in the
03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [R] zinb postestimation, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[R] zip postestimation, p. 2054–2055
|
The documentation for [R] zip postestimation has been
updated to document predict's new options
pr(n) and
pr(a,b), which were added in the
03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [R] zip postestimation, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[XT] xtgee, p. 140, first equation in Exchangeable
|
|
(1,2) |
[XT] xtgee postestimation, p. 144–152
|
The documentation for [XT] xtgee postestimation has been
updated to document predict's new options
pr(n) and
pr(a,b), which were added in the
03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [XT] xtgee postestimation, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[XT] xtmixed, p. 306–346
|
The documentation for [XT] xtmixed has been updated to document
three new residual variance–covariance structures, banded,
toeplitz, and exponential, which were added in the
03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [XT] xtmixed, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[XT] xtnbreg postestimation, p. 370–371
|
The documentation for [XT] xtnbreg postestimation has been
updated to document predict's new options
pr0(n) and
pr0(a,b), which were added in the
03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [XT] xtnbreg postestimation, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[XT] xtpoisson postestimation, p. 405–407
|
The documentation for [XT] xtpoisson postestimation has been
updated to document predict's new options
pr0(n) and
pr0(a,b) for RE and FE models and
pr(n) and
pr(a,b) for PA models, which were
added in the 03 Jun 2010 Stata 11.1 update. To see
the latest PDF of [XT] xtpoisson postestimation, click
here.
|
|
|
(1,2) |
[XT] xtreg, p. 465, second equation
|
